What’s the Point of Advocacy?

June 14, 2009

savingSMALL.jpgSigns of weariness among some of the campaigners who first brought Darfur to the world’s attention. After six years of advocacy, of campaigning for an end to the conflict, there’s a moment of soul-searching. Nick Kristof, columnist for the New York Times, wrote the first article that catapulted the crisis into public consciousness. Now he is wondering where it all went wrong.

Antonovs are in almost daily action. Millions are still crowded into the aid camps where malnutrition and disease run riot. There are continuing skirmishes between rebels and government. Expelled aid agencies are having to cave to Khartoum’s demands in order to return to Darfur. And President Bashir continues to gallivant around the Arab and African worlds in defiance of an International Criminal Court warrant for his arrest.

Writing in the New York Review of Books, Kristof says he is worried that President Obama shows few signs of having the will to tackle Darfur…

To some extent, that’s a reflection on the Save Darfur movement and on scribblers like myself who took up the Darfuri cause. We have failed to foster the political will to bring about change. For all our efforts, the situation on the ground may soon become worse. A "Darfur fatigue" has set in, and the movement has lost its steam. And of course the movement was always compromised by its own shortcomings, from infighting to naiveté to the ubiquitous penchant of advocacy groups for exaggeration.

He’s right and wrong in pretty much equal measures. Naivete and exaggeration have been the downfall of the Darfur movement. And Kristof more than anyone has been guilty of this – continally taling about light-skinned Janjaweed, for example. At the same time though the Save Darfur movement has done an incredible job of keeping Darfur on the political agenda. The issue was featured in US Presidential debates and Obama has appointed a Sudan envoy.

The advocacy movement has even achieved its two main goals – UN peacekeepers and an ICC arrest warrant. 

The advocates have been incredibly successful. The problem is that they have been pushing for the wrong solutions. If the likes of Kristof are having second thoughts then this can only be good for achieving peace in Darfur.

This issue is one of the main themes of my book, Saving Darfur: Everyone’s Favourite African War, due to be published by Reportage Press in November.



4 thoughts on “What’s the Point of Advocacy?”

  1. nuttycow says:

    If I buy your book for my dad’s Christmas pressie will you sign it 😉
    *wow* it’s like you’re a proper writer ‘n’ everything!

  2. I pre-ordered it on Amazon, never done that before. So it better be bloody good. Every page better be dotted in beads of proverbial sweat.

  3. Deontologist says:

    “Now he is wondering where it all went wrong.”
    Exactly! For some reason, some people in Darfur advocacy think that his article was a glowing love letter to the movement, like Kristof’s pieces from back in the day. They fail to see the undercurrent of doubt that’s now apparent in Kristof’s discussion of Darfur advocacy. You can read responses to the article like John Norris’s to see what I mean. Moreover, the inside scoop (i.e. what people within the movement are saying) is that these advocacy leaders aren’t just putting on a brave face and pretending to be pleased with the article. No, they’re actually, really, honestly happy with it and don’t see how it casts doubt on the movement or differs from Kristof’s past pieces. Unbelievable, I know. But that’s really what I’ve heard and it seems true if blog posts like Norris’s are any indication:
    Ugh! The real tragedy is that there aren’t enough hours in the day for me to blog about every crazy thing these people do.

  4. Rob Crilly says:

    Dotted with proverbial blood, I think may be more accurate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.